<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
>
<channel>
	<title>XPBURN Rated and Reviewed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://xpburn.paehl.qarchive.org/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://xpburn.paehl.qarchive.org/#comments</link>
	<description>Read what other users have to say about XPBURN. Dozens of reviews, opinions, comments, ratings and discussions updated in real time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate><br />
<b>Warning</b>:  date() [<a href='function.date'>function.date</a>]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'America/Chicago' for 'CDT/-5.0/DST' instead in <b>/backup/qa/www/sub/rss/product.php</b> on line <b>32</b><br />
Fri, 24 Sep 2010 11:26:21 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<item>
		<title>Author: Schnejder</title>
		<link>http://xpburn.paehl.qarchive.org/#comment-32086</link>
		<dc:creator>Schnejder</dc:creator>
<br />
<b>Warning</b>:  date() [<a href='function.date'>function.date</a>]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'America/Chicago' for 'CDT/-5.0/DST' instead in <b>/backup/qa/www/sub/rss/product.php</b> on line <b>46</b><br />
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 11:26:21 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://xpburn.paehl.qarchive.org/#comment-32086</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A great program - total ok]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[A great program - total ok]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Author: M.G `Thank you all for this develope.`</title>
		<link>http://xpburn.paehl.qarchive.org/#comment-6573</link>
		<dc:creator>M.G</dc:creator>
<br />
<b>Warning</b>:  date() [<a href='function.date'>function.date</a>]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'America/Chicago' for 'CDT/-5.0/DST' instead in <b>/backup/qa/www/sub/rss/product.php</b> on line <b>46</b><br />
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 01:36:50 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://xpburn.paehl.qarchive.org/#comment-6573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you all for this software. It really helps me.<br />
Keep doing the great job.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[Thank you all for this software. It really helps me.<br />
Keep doing the great job.]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Author: Daniel Bonnici `Opinion`</title>
		<link>http://xpburn.paehl.qarchive.org/#comment-6409</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Bonnici</dc:creator>
<br />
<b>Warning</b>:  date() [<a href='function.date'>function.date</a>]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'America/Chicago' for 'CDT/-5.0/DST' instead in <b>/backup/qa/www/sub/rss/product.php</b> on line <b>46</b><br />
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 18:55:36 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://xpburn.paehl.qarchive.org/#comment-6409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have no doubt that this program performs well.<br />
Unfortunately, before it can be configured to run within Windows XP-Pro, it is necessary to download from MSN several megabytes of support software which (I guess) enable this add-on to function and without which it is as useless as an anchor for the task advertised.<br />
<br />
Try again friends:<br />
Daniel Bonnici ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[I have no doubt that this program performs well.<br />
Unfortunately, before it can be configured to run within Windows XP-Pro, it is necessary to download from MSN several megabytes of support software which (I guess) enable this add-on to function and without which it is as useless as an anchor for the task advertised.<br />
<br />
Try again friends:<br />
Daniel Bonnici ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Author: Bidtildawn `Great Resource - Needs Serious Error Handling`</title>
		<link>http://xpburn.paehl.qarchive.org/#comment-5150</link>
		<dc:creator>Bidtildawn</dc:creator>
<br />
<b>Warning</b>:  date() [<a href='function.date'>function.date</a>]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'America/Chicago' for 'CDT/-5.0/DST' instead in <b>/backup/qa/www/sub/rss/product.php</b> on line <b>46</b><br />
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 06:49:44 -0600</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://xpburn.paehl.qarchive.org/#comment-5150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While I found this very useful and informative and a wealth of information I see some shortcomings. First in the real world there are deadlines. Time you invest has to carry over. XPBURN does great things until you tell it to burn without a CD in the drive or something where error handling is necessary. Off the bat, even with me adding exception error handling in, if an error such as this occurs, even killing the application and restarting it leaves things in limbo. The work and time it would take to make something like this useful in a commerical quality sense is just not worth it. While I am not nuts about copying files to the CD Wizard cache and invoking the wizard, I chose to take that route over XPBURN. Archiving to CD is just a side item for what I am writing. If I want to take it further it would cost me more time to make XPBURN stable than it would to purchase a commerical library. If I had time at home like in the old days which some programmers have the luxury of, I would most likely stick with XPBURN and do the work however, VISTA is creeping up quickly and while I am doing everything to avoid what I have read about VISTA, VISTA will be here soon or MS will introduce a cousin under another name if it becomes another Windows ME. Either way my final thought is although I am very fond of XP, MS will disown it in 2008 and to invest time in XPBURN is not a solution for me personally.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[While I found this very useful and informative and a wealth of information I see some shortcomings. First in the real world there are deadlines. Time you invest has to carry over. XPBURN does great things until you tell it to burn without a CD in the drive or something where error handling is necessary. Off the bat, even with me adding exception error handling in, if an error such as this occurs, even killing the application and restarting it leaves things in limbo. The work and time it would take to make something like this useful in a commerical quality sense is just not worth it. While I am not nuts about copying files to the CD Wizard cache and invoking the wizard, I chose to take that route over XPBURN. Archiving to CD is just a side item for what I am writing. If I want to take it further it would cost me more time to make XPBURN stable than it would to purchase a commerical library. If I had time at home like in the old days which some programmers have the luxury of, I would most likely stick with XPBURN and do the work however, VISTA is creeping up quickly and while I am doing everything to avoid what I have read about VISTA, VISTA will be here soon or MS will introduce a cousin under another name if it becomes another Windows ME. Either way my final thought is although I am very fond of XP, MS will disown it in 2008 and to invest time in XPBURN is not a solution for me personally.]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss> 

